##
gets replaced by #
in just the
same way that #1
gets replaced by ‘whatever is the first argument’.
So if you define a macro:
\newcommand\a[1]{+#1+#1+#1+}
or (using the TeX primitive \
def
):
\def\a#1{+#1+#1+#1+}
and use it as \
a{b}
,
the macro expansion produces ‘+b+b+b+’,
as most people would expect.
\newcommand\a[1]{+#1+\newcommand\x[1]{xxx#1}}
then \
a{b}
will give us the rather odd
+b+\
newcommand{x}[1]
{xxxb}
so that the new \
x
ignores its argument.
\def\a#1{+#1+\def\x #1{xxx#1}}
\
a{b}
will expand to ‘+b+\def\x b{xxxb}
’. This
defines \
x
to be a macro delimited by b
, and taking no
arguments, which is surely not what was intended!
\
x
to take an argument, we need
\newcommand\a[1]{+#1+\newcommand\x[1]{xxx##1}}
or, using the TeX primitive definition:
\def\a#1{+#1+\def\x ##1{xxx##1}}
and \
a{b}
will expand to
+b+\def\x #1{xxx#1}
because #1
gets replaced by ‘b’
and ##
gets replaced by #
.
####1
, doubling the number of #
signs; and at the next level
you need 8 #
s each time, and so on.
This question on the Web: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=hash